Hijab ban amounts to direct discrimination

Tags: Race Discrimination, Employment Law, Employment Tribunal, Hijab

Despite efforts to encourage diversity in the workplace, employers can still get caught out by the equality legislation. This has been demonstrated by the recent decision in Bougnaoui and another v Micropole SA where a ban on an employee wearing her Islamic headscarf (hijab) was deemed to be direct discrimination. 

Ms Bougnaoui, a Muslim woman who worked for Micropole an operating company in France, was dismissed when she refused to comply with her employers request for the removal of her headscarf when in contact with customers. The request was made following a customer complaint. 

The court in the first instance, and upon appeal, held that the employers practice was not discriminatory as it was a “genuine and determining occupation requirement”. 

However, when the matter was referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) the Advocate General (AG) concluded that the employee’s dismissal for wearing an Islamic headscarf at work was directly discriminatory on grounds of religion or belief. It was clear that a non-Muslim employee would not have been treated in the same way.  

The AG added that discrimination would only be lawful, i.e. be based on an “occupational requirement”, when it was genuine and absolutely necessary. The example given was for health & safety reasons. 


This decision highlights the need for employers to ensure that commercial needs are not put before the needs of employees who fall within the definition of having a ‘protected characteristic’ within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010. 

This is, of course, a European decision so its relevance may be debateable once the Brexit negotiations commence.  

Here at SCE we have a wealth of experience in dealing with similar issues If you need advice in managing a discrimination complaint please me on 0113 3 50 40 30 or at samira.cakali@scesolicitors.co.uk

No Comments

Add a Comment


  • Seasonal Workers: Key Contractual Issues for Employers

    Tags: Employment Status, ukemplaw, Seasonal Workers, Contractual Issues, Fixed-term, Pat-time, Casual workers, Agency workers, Young persons, EmploymentLaw

    In sectors such as hospitality, tourism, retail and agriculture, seasonal peaks can bring an influx of work at certain times of the year. A common solution for employers in these sectors is to recruit additional employees during these periods. Below we set out the key contractual considerations for employers to bear in mind when hiring seasonal employees. 

    Fixed-term employees

    An individual recruited to cover seasonal work may be taken on for a limited period of time. A fixed-term contract is therefore often used, with that contract ending on a specific date or on completion of a particular project.

    An individual employed on a fixed-term contract is protected against less favourable treatment compared to permanent employees. For example, if an employer excludes the fixed-term … more


Reviews and Ratings for solicitor Samira Cakali, Leeds