Discrimination on the basis of religion and/or belief is unlawful under the Equality Act 2010 (“the Act”). Therefore no employee or worker (including those deemed to be self-employed) should be discriminated against because of the religion they practice or the beliefs they hold. This extends to discrimination against individuals on the basis that they hold no religion or philosophical belief. 

If you have been refused employment, offered employment on less favourable terms, denied promotion, training of other benefits, subjected to a detriment, dismissed or subjected to unwanted conduct, and you believe this is because of your religion and/or belief; you may have a claim for religion and/or belief discrimination. 

Types of Discrimination

  1. Direct discrimination: This is where someone is treated less favourably and that less favourable treatment is because of their religion and/or belief, for example this would be where an employer refuses an employees request to wear religious jewellery at work (providing there is no health and safety risk). 
  2. Indirect Discrimination: This is where an employer imposes a provision, criterion or practice (usually a policy) applicable to everyone, but which causes disadvantage to one group over another, and there is no objective justification for it. An example of this would be where an employer implements a new shift pattern making working on a Saturday mandatory. This then has the effect of making it impossible for employees of the Jewish faith to observe this day as their holy day of rest.
  3. Harassment: In general terms this is unwanted conduct which has the purpose or effect of violating your dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment. This can be bullying which is violent or obvious as well as teasing, nicknames, jokes, or other behaviour which is not done with malicious intent but which is upsetting.
  4. Victimisation: This is where a person receives less favourable treatment compared to others because they have either brought (or given evidence in) an Employment Tribunal, or raised a grievance alleging discrimination protected under the Act. 
  5. The Act also provides for ‘vicarious liability’ provisions, making an employer responsible for the acts of their employees. 

Qualifying service 

An employee does not require a qualifying service to bring a claim for religion and/or belief discrimination. 

Time Limits 

The time limit for bringing a claim for discrimination on the basis or religion and/or belief in the Employment Tribunal (ET) is three months less one day from the date of the last act of discrimination. Extensions of this time limit are only available in exceptional circumstances.

Remedies 

If an employee or worker succeeds in a claim for religion and/or belief discrimination, the ET has the power to order the payment of compensation. The award would normally comprise of two elements: injury to feelings and loss of earnings. 

Further the ET has the jurisdiction to award damages for personal injury and make recommendations that an employer takes specific action, within a specified period.  

If you feel you have been discriminated against in the workplace because of your religion and/or belief, please contact us on 0113 350 4030 or complete the enquiry form for a free telephone consultation. Alternatively, why not drop into one of our free clinics on Wednesday’s from 5:30pm until 7:30pm at our offices

We will explore all avenues of funding. 

LATEST LEGAL UPDATES:

  • Gig Economy – Royal Mail Group Facing legal action from drivers

    Tags: National Minimum Wage, Employment Tribunal, Employment Appeal Tribunal, Gig Economy, Worker, Supreme Court, Self-Employed, Royal Mail, Drivers, DPD

    The trend towards gig economy drivers and contractors demanding employment status rights will continue throughout 2018. This should come as no surprise when you consider the recent report published by parliamentary committees which determined nearly 1.6 million people work for gig-economy giants and find relatively little protection provided under current employment law due to their status. 

    We previously reported on the Uber drivers ongoing battle in August 2016, and the EAT decision in November 2017 if you haven’t been keeping up with our gig economy posts. 

    More recently, in December 2017, couriers at Parcelforce Worldwide commenced legal action against its parent group, Royal Mail Group Ltd, over failure to pay drivers the national minimum wage and holiday pay.& … more

    

Reviews and Ratings for solicitor Samira Cakali, Leeds